WND writer Chelsea Schilling highlighted a movement going on to normalize pedophilia.
CNN recently featured a story by James Cantor, a homosexual psychologist and scientist at the Sexual Behaviors Clinic of the Center for Addiction and Mental Health who serves as associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto.
“It appears that one can be born with a brain predisposed to experience sexual arousal in response to children,” he wrote in his CNN piece.
He continued, “Cases of child molestation that involve long strings of victims over the course of years illustrate what can happen when someone gives in to, or outright indulges, his sexual interests, regardless of its potential damage on others. It is those cases that dominate headlines and provoke revulsion toward pedophiles.
“But they are rare. An untold number of cases merit sympathy.
“The science suggests that they are people who, through no fault of their own, were born with a sex drive that they must continuously resist, without exception, throughout their entire lives. Little if any assistance is ever available for them.”
It’s hard to have a discussion without first turning to TV, public education, accepted forms of punishment and the destruction of the family but these “experts” never fail. The scientist goes on to add:
Pedophilic men have significantly less white matter, which is the connective tissue that is responsible for communication between different regions in the brain. Pedophiles perform more poorly on various tests of brain function, tend to be shorter in height and are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous (characteristics that are observable before birth). Although nonbiological features may yet turn up to be relevant, it is difficult, if not impossible, to explain the research findings without there being a strong role of biology.
Something happened to Jerry Sandusky when he was a kid. It was not good. As a result, he became a wrecking ball. This is not some sort of revelation.
The question is: What is the motivation of the scientist? CNN? The anchor? What’s your point? How do you want us to adjust? What’s your solution?
Why don’t you just write a book for us, with plenty of pictures, so we know how to behave.